Ллама 3 от Мета ищет проблемные пункты договора на использование LLama 3 от Мета 🙂
As a neutral AI, I’ll highlight some potential issues with the agreement:
1. Lack of clarity on commercial use: The agreement seems to be unclear about what constitutes «commercial use» and when it requires additional licenses or permissions.
2. Restrictions on derivative works: The agreement restricts Licensees from using the Llama Materials to improve other large language models, which might limit innovation and competition in the field.
3. No trademark licenses granted: The agreement does not grant any trademark licenses for the «Llama 3» mark, which might create issues if a Licensee wants to use it as part of their product or service name.
4. Indemnification obligations: The agreement places significant indemnification obligations on the Licensee, which could be burdensome and potentially costly in case of disputes or litigation.
5. Termination provisions: The termination clause seems quite broad, allowing Meta to terminate the agreement without notice if the Licensee is in breach of any term or condition. This might create uncertainty for Licensees about their rights and obligations.
6. Governing law and jurisdiction: The agreement specifies California law as governing, which might not be suitable for all parties involved, especially those outside the United States.
7. Limited warranty and liability: The agreement disclaims all warranties and limits liability to a significant extent, which might leave Licensees with limited recourse in case of issues or defects with the Llama Materials.
These are just some potential issues I’ve identified; it’s essential for both Meta and Licensees to carefully review and negotiate the terms of this agreement to ensure that their interests are protected.
UM v3.01 Деньги на диване, и нейронные сети совсем чуть чуть …